Having represented the Respondent at trial in August 2017, and having won at first instance, Bruno Gil was once again instructed to act for the Trust in the Claimant’s appeal to the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT).
On appeal Bruno successfully argued that the Claimant’s appeal should not succeed as the conclusions drawn by the Tribunal were permissible on the evidence heard at trial, the approach taken regarding causation was correct, and the Claimant could not come close to reaching the high threshold for a perversity appeal.
The Claimant’s appeal failed.
To view the full judgment, please click here.
employment; tribunal; EAT; evidence; causation
The ‘capable, efficient, and helpful’ clerks’ room provides ‘a service-orientated approach and goes above and beyond in trying to ensure you have the right barrister for the job ; you have the utmost confidence in the clerking.”
‘an extremely approachable set of chambers which puts a premium on service delivery.’
Old Square Chambers is delighted to announce that is has again been ranked as a top band set in the…
Old Square’s Nadia Motraghi is acting for the BMA in its judicial review of these controversial Regulations which impose a…
View MoreWilliam Meade (Senior Clerk)
or
Graham Smith (Deputy Senior Clerk)
