Having represented the Respondent at trial in August 2017, and having won at first instance, Bruno Gil was once again instructed to act for the Trust in the Claimant’s appeal to the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT).
On appeal Bruno successfully argued that the Claimant’s appeal should not succeed as the conclusions drawn by the Tribunal were permissible on the evidence heard at trial, the approach taken regarding causation was correct, and the Claimant could not come close to reaching the high threshold for a perversity appeal.
The Claimant’s appeal failed.
To view the full judgment, please click here.
employment; tribunal; EAT; evidence; causation
"The ‘capable, efficient, and helpful’ clerks’ room provides ‘a service-orientated approach and goes above and beyond in trying to ensure you have the right barrister for the job ; you have the utmost confidence in the clerking”
"An extremely approachable set of chambers which puts a premium on service delivery"
We are delighted to announce that Ijeoma Omambala QC has been named in The Lawyer Hot 100 2021. Ijeoma specialises…
We are delighted to announce that Turan Hursit, previously of Doughty Street Chambers, has joined Old Square Chambers. Turan brings…
View MoreWilliam Meade (Senior Clerk)
or
Graham Smith (Deputy Senior Clerk)
