Employment Appeal Tribunal
An employment tribunal had not erred in dismissing the disability discrimination claim of an employee who had been dismissed because of his unsatisfactory attendance record.
The appellant (W) appealed against a decision of an employment tribunal to dismiss his claim for disability discrimination against the respondentsecretaryof state, his former employer.
W had been dismissed from his employment at a job centre because his attendance record was deemed to be unacceptable. He had been suffering from irritable bowel syndrome for a number of years. There was a general annual allowance of eight days for absence through sickness, which in W's case was increased to 13 days. He was dismissed after his absence exceeded that level. In respect of his disability discrimination claim, W asserted that thesecretaryof state should have granted him an allowance of 18 days. The tribunal rejected that complaint, holding that W had given no evidence of comparators. The tribunal also concluded that, as W had been given an allowance of 13 days, he appeared to have been treated more favourably than any other employee about whom it had heard. W had also complained of a written warning which had been issued to him after he exceeded his sickness allowance. The tribunal dismissed that complaint, holding that no evidence had been given about how other staff were treated or how they would have been treated. For the same reasons, the tribunal rejected W's complaint that his dismissal constituted disability discrimination.
Counsel for the respondent: Andrew Midgley
The ‘capable, efficient, and helpful’ clerks’ room provides ‘a service-orientated approach and goes above and beyond in trying to ensure you have the right barrister for the job ; you have the utmost confidence in the clerking.”
‘an extremely approachable set of chambers which puts a premium on service delivery.’
Old Square Chambers is delighted to announce that it has again been ranked as a top band set in the…
Old Square’s Nadia Motraghi is acting for the BMA in its judicial review of these controversial Regulations which impose a…View More