The Ministry of Justice has issued its latest paper on ‘The Personal Injury Discount Rate’ following the collation of responses to its discussion paper. It was heavily influenced by the research of the British Institute of International and Comparative Law (“BIICL”), as well as other evidence, including responses to questionnaires from: the Wealth Management Association, the Personal Finance Society, and the Association of Professional Financial Advisers: about investments personal injury Claimants would be advised to make.
BIICL research examined the discount rate applying to quantum in personal injury cases from a comparative law perspective, noting a broad range of rates: from 6% in the Australian State of Victoria, to 3.5% in Spain. It highlighted that no jurisdiction with a single discount rate, had a negative rate as is currently the case in the UK (- 0.75%).
Although there was division within the responses received, there was general agreement that claimants should be treated as more risk averse than ordinary prudent investors. Evidence indicated claimants invest in “low risk diversified portfolios” and not “very low risk” investments, such as ILGs. The government concluded that assumptions made by the present law on the setting of the discount rate, as to how claimants invest, were thus unrealistic, and the current rate may well produce significantly larger awards than the provision of 100% compensation. These current unrealistic assumptions were considered to have a significant effect on taxpayers through the additional costs of personal injury settlements, as paid for by the National Health Service and other public sector bodies; and also businesses and individual consumers, through higher insurance premiums.
There was also general agreement in the responses, that rate reviews should occur more frequently, and with greater predictability. However, there was disagreement on how frequently they should occur, and who should review it. The MoJ now intends to introduce time limits within which reviews must be held, with a review at least every three years. Whilst acknowledging support for an independent expert panel to be involved in the process of rate setting, the Government also accepted the importance of clear political accountability for any rate decisions.
The Government now intends to make the following changes:
At present the indication is that this figure will be in the 0% to 1% range, though the MoJ has not committed to a specific range or figure, and it remains for the Lord Chancellor “to decide where in the range of low risk the rate should be set”.
The Government will now publish draft clauses in light of these conclusions for further views to be provided. Following responses to such, it intends to introduce legislation to Parliament as soon as parliamentary time permits. Once enacted, the Lord Chancellor will initiate a review of the rate within 90 days, to be completed within 180 days of the beginning of the review period. A new rate will then be set (if appropriate), coming into force on a date fixed by the Lord Chancellor.
personal injury, ministry of justice, discount rate
"The ‘capable, efficient, and helpful’ clerks’ room provides ‘a service-orientated approach and goes above and beyond in trying to ensure you have the right barrister for the job ; you have the utmost confidence in the clerking”
"An extremely approachable set of chambers which puts a premium on service delivery"
Nicola Newbegin will be speaking at the ARDL Webinar on “Dual qualified registrants, double jeopardy and case management in multiple…
Our team of independent investigators are experts in their field and well placed to help your organisation navigate an internal…View More