On 24 February the Administrative Court (Hickinbottom J) gave judgment in R (Hussain) v Parole Board  EWHC 288 (Admin). Mr Hussain was one of a number of prisoners who experienced delay in the listing of their parole hearing following the increase in demand for oral hearings in the wake of the decision of the Supreme Court in R (Osborn) v Parole Board  AC 1115. This was the first case to consider the question of systemic delay for pre-tariff life sentence prisoners. The Court concluded that the (undisputed) delay in the listing of the claimant’s case was a breach of the Board’s public law and Article 5 obligations; but recognised the work done by the Board to deal with the backlog and declined to grant mandatory relief.
Ben Collins QC (leading David Bedenham of 11KBW and instructed by the Government Legal Department) appeared for the Board.
hussain, parole board, supreme court, osborn, article 5, government legal department
The ‘capable, efficient, and helpful’ clerks’ room provides ‘a service-orientated approach and goes above and beyond in trying to ensure you have the right barrister for the job ; you have the utmost confidence in the clerking.”
‘an extremely approachable set of chambers which puts a premium on service delivery.’
Old Square’s Nadia Motraghi is acting for the BMA in its judicial review of these controversial Regulations which impose a…
Date: 28th October 2020 Time: 2pm until 3pm via Zoom platform Each year Old Square Chambers takes the opportunity to…View More