Menu
Close
Search
Generic filters

"The barristers are reliable specialists in their field who provide high quality legal advice and representation. They also understand their clients."

Chambers & Partners
21/03/2011

Hendy v. Iberian Lineas De Espana SA

Uncategorized

County Court (Oxford)

A defendant airline was in breach of its obligation to provide meals and refreshments under Regulation 261/2004 art.9(1)(a) where a claimant's flight was cancelled due to flying restrictions. However, the breach of that obligation did not give rise to a civil right to seek a monetary award under the Regulations.
 

The claimant (H) brought a claim against the defendant airline (X) seeking compensation for costs incurred following the cancellation of an airline flight.

H had booked a return flight from the United Kingdom to Spain. The return flight was due to leave on April 16, 2010. Following a volcanic eruption, flying restrictions were imposed and H's return flight was cancelled. He was rebooked on a substitute flight due to leave on April 21, 2010 but, on April 20, he used an alternative means of returning to the UK. H claimed compensation for expenses, including the cost of meals, incurred between April 16 and April 20.

X submitted that by choosing to return home by his own means, H waived any rights he had under Regulation 261/2004 art.9(1)(a) .

HELD: Under art.5(1)(b) and art.9(1)(a), there was a period of waiting from April 16 until April 20 during which X's obligation under art.9(1)(a) to provide passengers with free meals and refreshments in certain circumstances arose. There had been a rebooking; X were aware that there would be a right to care under art.9.1. They should therefore be responsible for the costs reasonably incurred by H during that period. However, in accordance with the Civil Aviation (Denied Boarding, Compensation and Assistance) Regulations 2005 reg.3, breach of that obligation was, if anything, an offence and did not give rise to a civil right to seek compensation under the 2004 Regulations (see paras 11-12 of judgment).

Claim dismissed

Counsel:
For the claimant: In person
For the defendant: Mr Cunnington

 

LTL 15/7/2011
Hendy.pdf

The ‘capable, efficient, and helpful’ clerks’ room provides ‘a service-orientated approach and goes above and beyond in trying to ensure you have the right barrister for the job ; you have the utmost confidence in the clerking.”

Legal 500

‘an extremely approachable set of chambers which puts a premium on service delivery.’

Chambers & Partners
0
Shortlist Updated

Out of hours

William Meade (Senior Clerk)

07970 649 755

or

Graham Smith (Deputy Senior Clerk)

07795 023 532