Court of Appeal
A collective agreement that prescribed the distribution of "porterage" payments between registered porters at a fruit and vegetable market could not sensibly be interpreted to mean that, in later circumstances in which unregistered porters could lawfully work at the market, the porterage earned by unregistered porters should be paid exclusively to registered porters.
The appellants (H) appealed against a decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal (Gilgrove Ltd v Hay  I.C.R. 1171) dismissing their claim that the respondent employers had made unauthorised deductions from their wages contrary to the Employment Rights Act 1996 s.13.
H were porters at a wholesale fruit and vegetable market. The respondents were fruit and vegetable importers. H were all "registered porters", who had begun working as such during the existence of a collective agreement made in 1974 with the involvement of the union. The other porters employed by the respondents, who were not party to the proceedings, were "unregistered porters" who were employed after the termination of the 1974 agreement in 2009. Porterage was a charge made to customers by traders at the market for the movement of goods. Traditionally it would be pooled and shared between registered porters in accordance with the number of porters employed. Thus they received a basic wage plus their share of porterage. The unregistered porters were paid a higher wage but did not receive separate payment for porterage; their share of the porterage was held by the employers. H's case was that the porterage entitlement earned by both registered and unregistered porters was to be shared exclusively between the registered porters, in accordance with the 1974 agreement, which was incorporated into their employment contracts. The employment tribunal allowed their claim. The Employment Appeal Tribunal allowed the employers' appeal, holding that the intention and purpose of the 1974 agreement was to reward those actually performing the functions of porters in the market, not only those who satisfied the conditions of being registered and union members.
LTL 26/4/2013, ICR 1139
The ‘capable, efficient, and helpful’ clerks’ room provides ‘a service-orientated approach and goes above and beyond in trying to ensure you have the right barrister for the job ; you have the utmost confidence in the clerking.”
‘an extremely approachable set of chambers which puts a premium on service delivery.’
Date: 28th October 2020 Time: 2pm until 3pm via Zoom platform Each year Old Square Chambers takes the opportunity to…
Old Square Chambers is delighted to announce it has received three nominations for the Advocate Bar Pro Bono Awards 2020,…View More