Bruno Gil, pupil summarises the judgment of the EAT in Day v Lewisham NHS Trust and Health Education England (HEE).
The case concerns Dr Day, who worked in Lewisham NHS Trust but wanted to complain about a detriment he said HEE had subjected him to after blowing the whistle.
Bruno says “Dr Day is unlucky in that his relationship with HEE falls outside of the ambit of ERA whistle blowing protection. Dr Day is certainly not the junior doctor affected, however, given that there are 54,000 of them!”
Bruno will be on his feet from 1st April 2016.
To read the full article click here.
DR DAY LOSES WHISTLE BLOWING CASE AGAINST HEALTH EDUCATION ENGLAND IN EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL, NHS, WHISTLE BLOWING
The ‘capable, efficient, and helpful’ clerks’ room provides ‘a service-orientated approach and goes above and beyond in trying to ensure you have the right barrister for the job ; you have the utmost confidence in the clerking.”
‘an extremely approachable set of chambers which puts a premium on service delivery.’
Old Square’s Nadia Motraghi is acting for the BMA in its judicial review of these controversial Regulations which impose a…
Date: 28th October 2020 Time: 2pm until 3pm via Zoom platform Each year Old Square Chambers takes the opportunity to…View More